This maven has said nothing about the ongoing dispute here
in Richmond over Mayor Dwight Jones’ plan for the redevelopment of the Shockoe
Bottom area of the city, which centers on a new minor league baseball stadium.
I have been silent mainly because I am split on this issue, sort of like the
population of Richmond. I think the vicinity of the existing stadium (the
Diamond) would be a better place for a new stadium, but my preference is not
that strong. I also have serious questions whether the taxpayers of Richmond
should pay for a stadium for a privately-owned entity. But, we subsidize other
businesses to keep them in Richmond so why is a new stadium that different? I
am also strongly swayed by those of my African American friends who argue that
placing a stadium so close to where so many thousands of African slaves were
imprisoned and sold as property (and where many of them died and were buried)
is a disgrace to their memory. However, although I know what these friends
don’t want, I have not been able to figure out what they do want other than a
slogan that calls for an “historic district”. I think that we in Richmond
should be forever mindful of the outrageous activities that went on in Shockoe
Bottom for so many decades. But I am not sure this necessarily means that the
area must remain forever as it is. And, on my third “other hand,” I am aware
that the City of Richmond badly needs to expand its tax base. So, with this
internal ambiguity, what was a maven to say?
For the world outside of Richmond (and for you Richmonders
who have been hibernating for the last few months)—some time past (I am too
lazy to do the research to give you exact dates but exact dates are not
important) the mayor of our beloved city, Dwight Jones, revealed to all of us a
plan for the total revitalization of Shockoe Bottom. His plan included a new
baseball stadium, a hotel, a supermarket, apartment buildings and a structure
memorializing the slave trade that went on in the area in the 18th
and 19th centuries. The plan was complete with artist renderings and
financial statements. The mayor described his plan as essential to the
revitalization of the Shockoe area, as well as vital to the economic expansion
of the city. The mayor’s Shockoe plan was strongly connected to a more vaguely
described plan to develop the area along the Boulevard where the Diamond now
stands into a major commercial and residential neighborhood. A close
examination of the Shockoe plan showed that its financial success counted on
revenue from the Boulevard development. The mayor’s plan met both with very
strong support and very strong opposition.
The mayor’s plan cannot be implemented without the approval
of the Richmond City Council. In fact, because it requires the sale of city
owned property, the plan needs a super-majority to pass. Like the residents of
the city, members of the council are divided on the plan. The eventual outcome
will depend on those council members who have not yet decided. Although the
mayor and his supporters have called the Shockoe plan an all or nothing
proposition and have called for quick approval by the council, the council has
been very deliberate, asking questions and holding neighborhood meetings for
public input.
This week, probably out of frustration that his proposal has
not gained quick approval by the City Council, Mayor Jones raised the stakes.
As reported in the Richmond Free Press 1
and repeated in the Richmond Times Dispatch 2 at a prayer meeting commemorating the issuance of the Emancipation
Proclamation, the mayor said that the City of Richmond is “still 50%
African-American” but there is now a majority on the City Council “that doesn’t
look like us.” The mayor implied that those white members of the council who
don’t back his plan do not care about creating jobs for African-Americans. The
mayor’s attempt to turn this dispute into a racial issue is particularly
strange because the most vocal opponents of his development plan come from the
African-American community. If it turns out that the City Council does not
approve Mayor Jones’ plan, he may regret that he suggested that some of them
may be racists.
The mayor may also regret the way that he has tried to
implement this project. As I understand it, the mayor did not involve the City
Council, as a body, in the formation of the plan. After being mayor for nearly
five years, and having been reelected to a second term by a substantial
majority, Mr. Jones seems to have forgotten that under the City’s charter it is
the City Council, not the mayor, that is the governing body of the City of
Richmond. Under the charter, the mayor is responsible “for the proper
administration of city government.” He is also has several other specified responsibilities
including preparing a proposed city budget for the council’s consideration. But,
he is not the government. If I were a member of the City Council I would be
jealous of the council’s governing authority and I just might be resentful when
the mayor tells me that his plan is an all or nothing proposition and that my
only options are to vote “yes” or “no.” Further, it would have made political
sense to get council members involved in the planning for the Shockoe
development. People who feel they have contributed to the formulation of a plan
are not likely to oppose it when it comes up for a vote.
The Shockoe Bottom development plan will probably come onto
the City Council’s agenda later this month. If the plan passes, the mayor needs
to reach out to those who oppose a stadium in the former slave trading area by
making sure that the structure commemorating this dark period in our history is
one of the first to be built. He should also take the initiative in making sure
that the entire area of the city from the old Manchester Docks along the slave
trail up to Broad Street be designated a National Historic District. If the
plan is defeated, the mayor and City Council need to get together quickly and
create a new plan to redevelop the Shockoe Bottom area.
No comments:
Post a Comment