Sometimes, it is very frustrating to be a maven. You write
and you write but nobody seems to listen. I can’t count the number of times I
have explained the laws controlling the operation of the public schools in
Richmond, VA, USA. And just when I think everybody understands, I see a turf
war breaking out in our lovely city on the James between City Council and the
School Board. City Council wants to form a committee composed of
representatives of the mayor, council and school board to formulate a
three-year plan for the operation of Richmond Public Schools. The School Board
strongly objects to what it sees as an invasion of its jurisdiction. I don’t
have time to go into more detail, so if you want to know more read these two
articles. 1 2
Now, pay attention. I will explain this once more.
Article VIII, Section 1 of the Virginia Constitution provides:
“The
General Assembly shall provide for a system of free public elementary and
secondary schools for all children of school age throughout the Commonwealth,
and shall seek to ensure that an educational program of high quality is
established and continually maintained.”
Article
VIII, Section 7 of the constitution says:
“The
supervision of schools in each school division shall be vested in a school
board, to be composed of members selected in the manner, for the term,
possessing the qualifications, and to the number provided by law.”
In
implementing these constitutional mandates, the General Assembly enacted VA
Code section 22.1-28 which provides:
“The supervision of schools in each school division shall be
vested in a school board selected as provided in this chapter or as otherwise
provided by law.”
The drafters of the constitution could have chosen to place
school divisions under the control of local governing bodies like city councils
or boards of supervisors. That would have been logical. But they did not. They
put supervision of local school divisions in school boards that are independent
of local governing bodies. I assume they did so to insulate school operation
from local politics.
The citizens of Richmond maintained the independence of
their local school board in the City’s charter. Section 20.01 of the charter
reads, in part:
“Except as provided in this Charter the School
Board shall have all the powers and duties relating to the management and
control of the public schools of the City provided by the general laws of the
Commonwealth. None of the provisions of this Charter shall be interpreted to
refer to or include the School Board unless the intention so to do is expressly
stated or is clearly apparent from the context.”
So, what about the City Council? As the City’s
governing body, does it have no role to play in Richmond Public Schools? Yes,
it has a role. That role has to do with providing funding for the operation of
the schools. Section 22.1-93 of the Virginia Code states:
“Notwithstanding any other provision of law . . . the
governing body of a municipality shall prepare and approve an annual budget for
educational purposes by May fifteen or within thirty days of the receipt by the
municipality of the estimates of state funds, whichever shall later occur.”
The state law also mandates that the local governing body
provide a minimum amount of local funding to supplement state funding for
public schools. Section 22.1-94 says:
“A governing body may make appropriations to a school board
from the funds derived from local levies and from any other funds available,
for operation, capital outlay and debt service in the public schools. Such
appropriations shall be not less than the cost apportioned to the governing
body for maintaining an educational program meeting the standards of quality
for the several school divisions prescribed as provided by law.”
This requirement was incorporated in Section 6.14 of the
City Charter that provides:
“It shall be the duty of the school board to
submit its budget estimates to the mayor at the same time as other departments
and in the form prescribed by the mayor. The mayor and council may take any
action on the school budget permitted by § 22.1-94 of the Code of Virginia or
any other provision of general law not in conflict with this charter.”
But maven, surely the City Council has the statutory authority to
create a committee to formulate a three-year plan for Richmond Public Schools.
Trusted reader, you have not been listening
carefully. I have found no statute authorizing City Council to take such
action. This is no different than two years ago, when Mayor Jones created a school accountability and efficiency task force. As I said
then,
“Certainly, the mayor has
appointed it. However, he can only assign to the task force authority which he
has as mayor. He cannot create a committee or task force that has more
authority than he has.”
Likewise with the Council’s
committee. Council can create it, but it cannot assign to it authority that it
does not have.
Maven, are you really saying that City Council has no
authority to make sure Richmond Public Schools is operating properly?
Now, dear reader, you are putting
words in my mouth. Of course the City Council has authority. As the
appropriating body it has the implicit authority to oversee Richmond Public
School’s use of the money it gives it. As part of the yearly budget process,
the School Board submits its annual budget, which should explain how RPS used
past appropriations and how it intends to spend the money School Board is
asking for. If the Council is not satisfied with the explanations in the School
Board’s budget, it has the right to ask the Chair of the Board or the
Superintendent of Schools to explain in more detail.
Let me plagiarize some words I
wrote two years ago:
“Despite the separation in rolls
specified in state law, this maven is not advocating that the mayor and city
council have no responsibility for the operation of Richmond Public Schools. On
the contrary. I think that in the past some members of the city council have
sidestepped issues relating to RPS by saying it is the responsibility of the
school board not of the council. The condition of RPS is far too important to
the city for any elected official to ever say, ‘It’s not my responsibility.’
I’m sure I have said it before, but if I haven’t I will say it loudly and
clearly now: The City of Richmond will never be a great city until it has great
public schools. It really doesn’t matter what else the city government does. So
long as our schools are not world-class, Richmond will only be a C+ or B- city.”
So, Maven, what should we do?
Patient reader; you know that
before I enrolled in the Maven Academy I was an attorney. So I know how to operate
within the bounds of the law. I have two suggestions that can be implemented
immediately.
1- Let the city councilmember and
the school board representative in each of the city’s nine electoral districts
get together to discuss how the council and board can work together to improve
Richmond’s public schools. This will provide an opportunity to defuse the
current dispute and to build trust between them. This trust can be brought by
each back to the fully body.
2- At least twice each year, the
City Council should invite the Superintendent of Schools to meet with them to
share his plans for the public schools. This meeting will also give each
councilmember the opportunity to make suggestions to the Superintendent on how
things may be improved.
The city councilmember and school
board representative in each district were elected by the same voters. The
voters expected both people to do their statutory jobs and to work together to
make Richmond become the best city it can become. It is time for these 18
people to forget blame and personalities and get on with the business of
the City of Richmond.